The conventional reading of 2024’s cultural landscape – a patchwork of nostalgia, streaming expansion and feel-good diversity – misses the point entirely. This was the year pop culture stopped being something people watched and became something people did. Taylor Swift fans didn’t just attend the Eras Tour; they reshaped the economies of entire cities. Kendrick Lamar didn’t just release a diss track; he ignited a legal and ethical firestorm that reached the offices of Universal Music Group. Charli XCX didn’t just drop an album; she spawned a political lexicon. The distance between audience and participant collapsed, and the cultural industries scrambled to keep up.
The Economics of Obsession: Swift’s $2 Billion Machine
No single event in 2024 better illustrated the sheer gravitational force of pop culture than the conclusion of Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour. The final show took place on 8 December at BC Place in Vancouver, capping 149 performances across 21 months and five continents. When Taylor Swift Touring – the singer’s production company – disclosed the numbers to The New York Times for the first time, the figure was staggering: $2,077,618,725 in gross ticket sales. Pollstar’s independent estimate placed the total even higher, at $2.2 billion, with more than 10 million tickets sold.
To contextualise that number, the Eras Tour roughly doubled the gross of its nearest competitor, Coldplay’s Music of the Spheres run, which sat at an estimated $1.14 billion at the time of reporting. “What Taylor Swift and The Eras Tour accomplished in 21 months across five continents before 10 million fans is extraordinary and unprecedented,” said Andy Gensler, Pollstar’s editor-in-chief, in a statement accompanying the year-end figures.
But the tour’s significance extended far beyond balance sheets. Swift’s seven London shows at Wembley Stadium drew Prince William, who was photographed dancing in the crowd – a moment that crystallised the tour’s peculiar cultural reach, one that extended from teenage TikTok users to the heir to the British throne. In February, Swift had begun the year by winning Album of the Year at the Grammys for a record fourth time, then announced The Tortured Poets Department from the podium, flew to Tokyo for four shows, and jetted back to Las Vegas for the Super Bowl, where she was filmed kissing Travis Kelce on the field after Kansas City’s victory. The Eras Tour didn’t just dominate the year; it restructured the rhythm of the celebrity calendar itself.
The Rap War That Won’t Die
If Swift’s tour demonstrated the power of controlled spectacle, the feud between Kendrick Lamar and Drake proved how quickly cultural events can spin beyond anyone’s control – including the participants’. The conflict escalated in late April when Lamar appeared on Metro Boomin and Future’s track “Like That,” issuing a direct challenge. What followed was an unprecedented barrage: Drake responded, and over the course of a single weekend in early May, Lamar released three tracks – “Euphoria,” “Meet the Grahams” and “Not Like Us” – each more incendiary than the last.
“Not Like Us,” produced by DJ Mustard, was the one that broke through. Lamar’s lyrics accused Drake of predatory behaviour toward minors, packaging the allegations over an irresistibly danceable West Coast beat. The track became the song of the summer, topping charts globally and winning five Grammys in 2025, including Record of the Year and Song of the Year. Lamar leveraged the momentum into the Super Bowl LIX halftime show in February 2025, becoming the first solo rap act to headline the event.
But the fallout extended well beyond music. In January 2025, Drake filed a defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group, claiming the “certified pedophile” lyric in “Not Like Us” endangered his family. The suit referenced a shooting outside Drake’s Toronto mansion days after the track’s release, followed by two break-in attempts at the property over the following 48 hours. UMG’s response, filed in a motion to dismiss, was blunt: their signee “lost a rap battle that he provoked.” The legal battle is ongoing, raising genuine questions about the boundaries of artistic expression and the responsibilities of major labels when a diss track becomes a weapon.
Brat Summer and the New Guard
While Swift and Lamar commanded the headline machinery, the most culturally resonant shift of 2024 came from artists who arrived not as established titans but as sudden forces. Charli XCX’s Brat, released in June, was named the year’s best album in a BBC News “poll of polls” compiled from 30 year-end lists published by outlets including NME, Rolling Stone, Mondo Sonoro and Les Inrockuptibles. The album scored 486 points – nearly double that of the runner-up, Beyoncé’s Cowboy Carter.
Collins Dictionary named “brat” its word of the year, defining it as “characterised by a confident, independent, and hedonistic attitude.” The lime-green aesthetic became inescapable. When Kamala Harris became the Democratic presidential nominee in July, the campaign’s social media briefly adopted the brat aesthetic – a convergence that Charli XCX acknowledged with amusement on social media. The moment crystallised how thoroughly a pop album could colonise the political imagination, at least briefly.
The UK’s Official Charts confirmed Brat as the year’s eighth-biggest album, the highest-charting release by a British solo artist in 2024. A remix album, Brat and It’s Completely Different but Also Still Brat, released in October, finally pushed the original to number one on the Official Albums Chart.
Alongside Charli, Chappell Roan’s The Rise and Fall of a Midwest Princess – originally released in 2023 – became the UK’s sixth-biggest album of 2024, propelled by the singles “Good Luck, Babe!” and a string of incendiary live performances. Sabrina Carpenter’s Short n’ Sweet landed at number three on the UK year-end chart, confirming a generational shift in pop’s centre of gravity. These weren’t niche breakouts; they were commercial juggernauts that arrived with sharp artistic identities rather than corporate machinery behind them.
The Sequel Box Office: Hollywood’s Safety-First Bet
At the cinema, 2024 delivered a clear verdict: audiences wanted the familiar, but only if executed with precision. The year’s top ten highest-grossing films were entirely sequels, prequels or franchise entries – the first time this had happened since 2019, according to Box Office Mojo. Inside Out 2 led the pack with $1.69 billion worldwide, becoming the highest-grossing animated film in history and the fastest animated film to reach the $1 billion milestone. Disney’s Deadpool & Wolverine followed at $1.33 billion, becoming the highest-grossing R-rated film ever. Moana 2 rounded out the billion-dollar club at $1.05 billion.
Jon M. Chu’s Wicked adaptation, released in November, crossed $765 million globally, with its domestic opening marking the best first-day ticket pre-sales of any PG-rated film in 2024, behind only Frozen 2 and The Lion King (both 2019). Denis Villeneuve’s Dune: Part Two earned $715 million, confirming that audiences would show up for ambitious, non-franchise filmmaking – but only when it arrived with a built-in fanbase.
The numbers told a consistent story: original ideas struggled to compete with known quantities. The highest-performing non-sequel among the year’s top 20 was It Ends With Us, the Colleen Hoover adaptation that earned $351 million, itself a product of a book’s pre-existing audience. Hollywood’s takeaway was clear: in an era of streaming abundance and fragmented attention, theatrical releases needed to arrive pre-sold.
Small Screen, Big Impact: Streaming’s Quiet Revolution
Television’s most significant 2024 stories were defined less by spectacle than by craft and cultural specificity. FX’s Shōgun, adapted from James Clavell’s 1975 novel, dominated the conversation from its spring premiere through its Emmy sweep in September, where it won 18 awards – propelling FX past HBO and Netflix for the most Emmy wins in a single year. Hiroyuki Sanada, both lead actor and producer, insisted on an authenticity-first approach, hiring crew with samurai-film experience for everything from wigs to period-specific gestures.
“Authenticity was our lifeline for this show,” Sanada told NPR. “In Japan, this period is so popular, the most famous period, and then there are great characters there. So I wanted to introduce this to the world, hopefully correctly.” The show’s production budget was estimated at around $200 million for its first season alone, a figure that would have been unthinkable for a non-English-language period drama a decade ago.
On Netflix, Baby Reindeer – Richard Gadd’s autofictional account of being stalked – became a global phenomenon, accumulating 915 million minutes of viewing time in a single week in late April. The show sparked intense public debate about the ethics of dramatising real events and the boundaries of sympathy for victims who are also protagonists. Its success demonstrated that streaming audiences, often accused of preferring comfort viewing, were willing to engage with genuinely unsettling material when it arrived with sufficient emotional truth.
The Deeper Pattern: Culture as Infrastructure
What linked these disparate phenomena – a stadium tour, a rap feud, a lime-green album, an animated sequel, a Japanese period drama – was not any shared aesthetic or ideology but a structural shift. Pop culture in 2024 functioned as infrastructure. Swift’s tour generated economic data that economists studied. Lamar’s diss tracks produced legal precedents that lawyers debated. Charli XCX’s album shaped a political campaign’s visual language. Shōgun influenced how streaming platforms thought about global content investment.
This is not entirely new. What changed in 2024 was the speed and directness of the feedback loop. The audience no longer merely consumed culture and then discussed it; the consumption itself became the cultural event, and the discussion generated further consumption. Swift’s fans didn’t just attend shows – they posted, analysed, debated and created derivative content that fed the next news cycle. Lamar’s listeners didn’t just stream “Not Like Us” – they debated its legal implications in real time, which drove further streams.
The result was a year in which the boundary between pop culture and public life dissolved almost entirely. Whether that dissolution is cause for celebration or concern depends largely on what fills the gap. For the cultural industries, the implication is clear: the old model of producing content and delivering it to passive audiences is finished. In 2024, the audience became the product – and the producer, and the distributor, and the critic. The question for 2025 and beyond is whether the institutions that profit from this arrangement can adapt to a world where everyone, apparently, has a stake in the show.
For more on the intersection of music, media and culture, explore our Culture and Music sections.
