Avatar photo

Internationally recognised art and literary critic, writer and cultural producer. Published in ELLE, Glamour, Esquire and Cosmopolitan; member of the Union of Writers.

By Maria Bregman, writer and film critic

In the dim glow of a Tokyo cinema in the early 1970s, two masters of celluloid – Akira Kurosawa and Andrei Tarkovsky – sat shoulder-to-shoulder, bound by their obsession with humanity’s existential riddles. The film unspooling before them was Tarkovsky’s Solaris (1972), a haunting meditation on memory, love, and the limits of human understanding. Kurosawa, the samurai-sword-sharp storyteller of Seven Samurai (1954), and Tarkovsky, the Soviet poet of Stalker (1979), shared more than a screen that evening. They shared a language of silence, vodka, and the unspoken kinship of artists who dare to stare into the abyss.

This fleeting encounter – a collision of East and West, discipline and delirium – offers a portal into the souls of two filmmakers whose work transcended borders. It also reveals the fragile humanity behind their mythic legacies.

A Clash of Cinematic Titans

Kurosawa and Tarkovsky existed in parallel orbits. The former, a titan of post-war Japanese cinema, wielded narrative like a blade – precise, visceral, and unflinching. The latter, a visionary of Soviet film, sculpted time itself, his languid frames steeped in metaphysical yearning. Yet their meeting in Tokyo, as recounted by Kurosawa, crackles with the electricity of mutual recognition.

Tarkovsky, notoriously introspective and austere, had travelled to Japan amid the Cold War’s frosty cultural détente. His presence there was both political and personal; Solaris, a film critiquing Soviet scientific dogma, had already drawn Kremlin scrutiny. Kurosawa, meanwhile, was navigating his own crisis. After a suicide attempt in 1971, his career hung in limbo, his future uncertain. The screening of Solaris became an act of communion: two artists, battered by their respective systems, seeking solace in shared shadows.

Vodka and Vulnerability

The post-screening retreat to the Ittihad cinema restaurant unspooled like a scene from one of their films. Tarkovsky, a man who “usually didn’t drink,” succumbed to vodka’s warmth. Kurosawa recalled his guest drunkenly silencing the restaurant’s speakers before belting out the thunderous theme from Seven Samurai – a moment of unguarded joy that dissolved the weight of their reputations.

Here lies the paradox of artistic genius: the creators of Ikiru (1952) and Andrei Rublev (1966), films steeped in existential torment, found fleeting liberation in absurdity. Tarkovsky’s improvised parade through the restaurant, Kurosawa’s bemused laughter – these fragments defy the solemnity often ascribed to their work. They remind us that even prophets of despair crave lightness.

The Gravity of Solaris

Why Solaris? The film, adapted from Stanisław Lem’s novel, orbits a space station haunted by the psychic manifestations of its crew’s regrets. For Tarkovsky, it was a vessel to explore love as both salvation and prison. For Kurosawa, whose Rashomon (1950) dissected truth’s elusiveness, Solaris’s interrogation of memory and reality likely resonated deeply.

Their shared screening was less critique than confession. Kurosawa’s quip – “How wonderful that it’s terrifying” – hints at the film’s power to unsettle through ambiguity. Unlike the visceral violence of Throne of Blood (1957) or the stark moralism of High and Low (1963), Solaris lingers in the unresolved. Its terror is existential, not explosive – a mirror to the directors’ own fraught relationships with their craft.

Artistic Kinship Across Borders

The Cold War politicised art, yet Kurosawa and Tarkovsky defied such binaries. Kurosawa’s samurai epics, though distinctly Japanese, drew from Shakespeare and Dostoevsky. Tarkovsky’s Mirror (1975), a fever-dream of Soviet memory, echoed the fragmented lyricism of Japanese haiku. Their mutual admiration transcended ideology, rooted instead in a shared belief that cinema could – and must – confront life’s unanswerable questions.

This kinship surfaces in their visual languages. Kurosawa’s Ran (1985) and Tarkovsky’s The Sacrifice (1986) both climax with apocalyptic fire, their frames saturated with despair and transcendence. Rain, a recurring motif for both, becomes a purifying force in Seven Samurai and a symbol of spiritual decay in Stalker. Their worlds, though culturally distinct, pulse with the same existential blood.

Legacy of a Liquid Night

The Tokyo evening ended as all such nights must: with dawn’s inevitability. Tarkovsky, nursing a hangover, returned to the Soviet Union – a nation increasingly sceptical of his “decadent” artistry. Kurosawa, revitalised by the encounter, would soon embark on Dersu Uzala (1975), a film suffused with the same ecological reverence as Tarkovsky’s Nostalghia (1983).

Their bond, though brief, rippled through their work. Tarkovsky’s diaries later praised Kurosawa’s “unerring sense of rhythm,” while Kurosawa lamented the Soviet’s untimely death in 1986 as a loss to “all who believe in cinema’s soul.”

Echoes in Modern Storytelling

Decades later, their influence reverberates. Contemporary auteurs like Bong Joon-ho and Alex Garland inherit their obsession with moral ambiguity and human fragility. Parasite (2019), with its class warfare, channels Kurosawa’s societal scalpel. Annihilation (2018), a psychedelic descent into the unknown, owes debts to Tarkovsky’s atmospheric dread.

Even the rise of philosophical sci-fi – seen in films like Arrival (2016) and Blade Runner 2049 (2017) – traces back to that Tokyo screening. When Kurosawa and Tarkovsky clinked vodka glasses, they toasted not just their own survival, but the future of cinema as a medium unafraid to ask, What does it mean to be human?

The Unquiet Shadows of Genius

Yet their stories also warn of art’s cost. Kurosawa’s battles with depression, Tarkovsky’s exile and early death – these shadows linger in their frames. The same intensity that birthed Solaris and Ikiru exacted a personal toll. In today’s era of relentless productivity, their lives whisper a caution: genius is not a gift, but a reckoning.

The night they shared – vodka-soaked, chaotic, alive – remains a testament to art’s power to both fracture and heal. In a world increasingly fragmented, their legacy insists that cinema remains a bridge, a confessional, a mirror. As Kurosawa reflected, “In that moment, I felt such joy simply to be on this earth.” For two hours in a Tokyo theatre, two giants remembered what it meant to be small.