Senior editor and core member of the editorial team, contributing criticism and features across contemporary art, film and literature.

By Sara Bright

The enduring ambition of the visual arts has often been to seize a moment, to freeze an instant in perpetuity. Yet, paradoxically, another powerful current runs alongside this: the desire to capture, to embody, even to become, motion itself. From the earliest cave paintings depicting the hunt, with their superimposed limbs suggesting animalistic sprints, to the most technologically advanced contemporary installations, artists have grappled with the ephemeral nature of movement, seeking to translate its energy and vitality onto static surfaces or into three-dimensional space. This eternal quest to animate the inanimate, to make the still image pulse with life, forms a compelling narrative of innovation and reinterpretation. Creativitys.UK will tell you about the evolution of motion in visual arts, a journey that reflects not only changing artistic techniques but also shifting cultural perceptions of time, speed, and the very essence of existence.

Early Fleeting Moments

For centuries, representing motion was primarily about illusion. Think of the baroque swirl of a Bernini sculpture, where marble seems to flow like fabric in a divine wind, or the dramatic diagonals of a Rubens, propelling the viewer’s eye across tumultuous scenes. However, it was perhaps the Impressionists who began to engage with movement in a new, more observational manner. Edgar Degas, for instance, remains inextricably linked with the world of Parisian ballet. His depictions of dancers, often caught in rehearsal or mid-performance, are not portrayals of heroic action but studies in arrested kinesis. His pastels and oils capture the delicate balance, the strenuous poise, the fleeting gesture. Yet, these remain moments of motion, observed from without, the artist a spectator to the dance rather than a participant in its dynamic. His innovation lay in choosing informal, almost photographic compositions, suggesting the continuous flow from which this single instant was plucked.

Shattering Static Forms

The dawn of the twentieth century brought with it a seismic shift. The advent of photography, particularly Eadweard Muybridge’s pioneering photographic sequences of humans and animals in motion, had already deconstructed movement into its constituent parts, revealing what the naked eye could not perceive. This scientific breakdown profoundly influenced artists. Marcel Duchamp’s “Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2” (1912), famously scandalising audiences at the Armory Show, directly referenced chronophotography, layering successive phases of movement onto a single canvas to depict a figure in transit. Concurrently, the Italian Futurists, intoxicated by the speed of modern life – the automobile, the aeroplane – declared war on artistic tradition. Artists like Umberto Boccioni, with his sculpture “Unique Forms of Continuity in Space” (1913), and Giacomo Balla, in paintings such as “Dynamism of a Dog on a Leash” (1912), sought to convey not just the appearance of motion, but its very sensation, its “dynamic force.” Their manifestos extolled “universal dynamism,” aiming to place the spectator at the centre of the picture, surrounded by a whirlwind of lines of force and interpenetrating planes.

Movement Made Manifest

While the Futurists painted the sensation of speed, other artists began to explore literal, physical movement within the artwork itself. Alexander Calder, an American sculptor, revolutionised the medium with his “mobiles” from the 1930s onwards. These delicately balanced constructions of abstract shapes, suspended by wires, responded to the slightest air currents, creating ever-changing compositions. Calder’s work was a playful yet profound departure, making motion an intrinsic, unpredictable element of the artwork. He famously declared, “Why not plastic forms in motion? Not a simple translation, not a repetition, but a new invention.” In Europe, artists like Jean Tinguely took this a step further with his “metamechanics” – complex, often cacophonous machines that performed, and sometimes spectacularly self-destructed, challenging notions of permanence and artistic control. These kinetic works directly engaged the viewer in a temporal experience, the artwork unfolding over time.

Gesture As Event

The mid-twentieth century witnessed the rise of Abstract Expressionism, particularly in New York, where the act of painting itself became a primary focus. For artists like Jackson Pollock, the canvas was an “arena in which to act,” as critic Harold Rosenberg termed it. Pollock’s drip technique, where he moved around and within large canvases laid on the floor, letting paint fall from can or stick, recorded the energy and rhythm of his own bodily movements. The resulting skeins and webs of paint are not representations of motion, but direct traces of it – a gestural dance frozen in time. Willem de Kooning’s canvases, too, seethe with vigorous, slashing brushstrokes, conveying a raw, almost violent energy where the process of creation, the artist’s physical engagement with the materials, is palpable. Here, motion is embedded within the very fabric of the paint.

The Body’s Imprint

This emphasis on the artist’s body and the process of creation paved the way for performance art, where the body itself becomes the primary medium. Building upon this legacy, contemporary artists are finding ever more innovative ways to integrate physical movement directly into the making of visual art. Florence Peake, a London-based artist and choreographer, stands as a compelling example of this synthesis. Her practice, notably her 2021 performance at the National Gallery and subsequent works, involves dancers interacting directly with canvases spread across the floor. Their bodies, guided by Peake’s choreography, become living brushes, imprinting the canvas with the dynamism, fluidity, and raw energy of dance. The resulting artworks are not mere depictions of dancers; they are artefacts of the dance itself, imbued with its rhythm and spatial complexity. Peake’s method transforms the canvas into a site of embodied experience, challenging the traditional separation between the act of dancing and the act of painting.

Rhythm’s Guiding Hand

The influence of dance and bodily rhythm extends beyond explicitly performative methods. Artists like Megan Rooney and José Parlá, though working in different abstract idioms, allow the cadence and flow akin to dance to inform their brushstrokes and compositions. Rooney’s large-scale murals and paintings often evoke a sense of continuous movement, her gestures weaving across the surface with an almost choreographic grace. Parlá’s calligraphic abstractions, meanwhile, pulse with an urban rhythm, his marks layered like traces of movement through cityscapes, suggesting both speed and the passage of time. For these artists, the internalised feeling of motion, whether from dance, music, or the environment, translates into a visual language of dynamic mark-making. Sophie von Hellermann’s paintings, with their fluid, washy application and ethereal figures, often seem to capture beings in a state of perpetual, gentle motion, drifting through dreamlike narratives. Her technique itself mirrors this fluidity, allowing colours to bleed and merge, resisting static definition.

Contemporary Convergences Today

The contemporary art scene is rich with artists exploring the nuances of motion, often blurring disciplinary boundaries. Lynette Yiadom-Boakye, known for her compelling portraits of imagined black figures, often imbues her subjects with a subtle kinesis. They might be caught mid-gesture, or in a moment of poised stillness that nonetheless vibrates with potential movement, inviting the viewer to complete the narrative. Her figures rarely sit passively; there is an inherent life force, a suggestion of an inner world in motion. Ulla von Brandenburg, working across film, drawing, installation, and performance, frequently uses tableaux vivants, slow, deliberate movements, and theatrical staging. Her works often explore rituals, social structures, and historical narratives, where the choreographed or carefully restricted movement of figures becomes a central element of meaning, guiding the viewer’s perception and emotional response. The interplay between stillness and subtle shifts creates a palpable tension and highlights the significance of even the smallest gestures.

Digital Age Dynamism

The advent of digital technologies has, of course, opened up entirely new territories for the exploration of motion. Video art, interactive installations, and virtual reality now allow artists to create immersive environments where movement is not just represented or implied but experienced directly by the viewer. Bill Viola’s slow-motion video works, for instance, transform human actions into profound, almost spiritual meditations, stretching moments to reveal their emotional depth. Digital animation allows for impossible transformations and fluid narratives, unbound by physical constraints. These new media offer unprecedented tools for artists to engage with temporality, kinesis, and the viewer’s sensory experience, pushing the boundaries of what it means to create and perceive art that moves.

Perceiving Perpetual Motion

The evolution of motion in visual art is a testament to art’s adaptive capacity and its persistent dialogue with human experience. From the quest to trick the eye into perceiving movement on a flat surface, to the incorporation of actual mechanical motion, to the embodiment of gesture and dance within the creative act itself, artists continually redefine how kinesis can be expressed and understood. Each development has not only expanded the technical repertoire of art but has also deepened its ability to communicate complex ideas about time, energy, the body, and the very nature of being. This journey is far from over. As artists like Florence Peake continue to forge new connections between disciplines, and as technology offers ever more sophisticated tools, the representation and embodiment of motion will undoubtedly continue to evolve in fascinating and unpredictable ways. The restless canvas, and indeed the restless artist, will ensure that art never truly stands still, inviting us always to look closer, to feel deeper, and to participate in its unending dance.