Senior editor and core member of the editorial team, contributing criticism and features across contemporary art, film and literature.

By Sara Bright

In an era where superhero fatigue looms like a spectre over Hollywood, Marvel Studios is betting big on reinvention. Captain America: New World Order – the first solo film to feature Anthony Mackie’s Sam Wilson as the star-spangled icon – isn’t just a passing of the shield. It’s a seismic shift in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), blending political intrigue, legacy characters, and a controversial new antagonist: Harrison Ford’s Red Hulk. As the film prepares to debut on 14 February 2025, audiences are left wondering: Can a Captain America without Steve Rogers – or his original actor – carry the weight of a fractured world?

A Shield Without a Star

For decades, Steve Rogers’ unwavering moral compass defined Captain America. Chris Evans’ retirement from the role in 2019 left a void that Mackie’s Sam Wilson – a former Falcon turned reluctant symbol – must now fill. Unlike Rogers, Wilson isn’t a super-soldier. He’s a veteran grappling with systemic inequality, a theme explored in the Disney+ series The Falcon and the Winter Soldier. The film’s trailer hints at his struggle to reconcile idealism with a geopolitical landscape where “patriotism” is increasingly weaponised.

Director Julius Onah (The Cloverfield Paradox) frames Wilson’s journey as a “paranoid thriller,” evoking the taut realism of Captain America: The Winter Soldier. Gone are the cosmic stakes of Avengers: Endgame; instead, the film pits Wilson against Tim Blake Nelson’s Leader, a cerebral villain mutated by Hulk’s blood. The clash is both physical and ideological, forcing Wilson to question whether the mantle of Captain America can – or should – exist in a world distrustful of heroes.

Harrison Ford’s Presidential Turn

At 82, Harrison Ford steps into the MCU as President Thaddeus “Thunderbolt” Ross, replacing the late William Hurt. Ross, a hardline militarist in prior films, undergoes a grotesque transformation into Red Hulk – a nod to the character’s comic-book arc. Ford’s gruff charisma lends gravitas to a role that could easily veer into camp. Early stills show him mid-transformation, his face contorted in rage – a stark contrast to his stoic turn in Air Force One.

The casting is a masterstroke. Ford’s legacy as Indiana Jones and Han Solo bridges generational divides, while his portrayal of a leader mutated by his own hubris mirrors contemporary anxieties about power. As Ross declares in the trailer: “Strength isn’t a serum. It’s a choice.” The line – delivered with Ford’s trademark gravel – hints at a nuanced exploration of authority gone rogue.

Hulk’s Shadow Looms Large

Though Mark Ruffalo’s Hulk remains absent, the film resurrects threads from 2008’s The Incredible Hulk. Liv Tyler returns as Betty Ross, Bruce Banner’s estranged love interest, now entangled in her father’s monstrous metamorphosis. Tim Blake Nelson’s Leader, last seen in the 2008 film, emerges as a Machiavellian schemer exploiting global instability.

This focus on Hulk’s lore is strategic. With Universal Studios holding distribution rights to solo Hulk films, Marvel cleverly sidesteps legal hurdles by weaving his mythos into New World Order. The result? A narrative steeped in body horror and ethical quandaries, far removed from the quippy banter of Thor: Ragnarok.

From Disney+ to Silver Screen

The film’s roots in The Falcon and the Winter Soldier are undeniable. Danny Ramirez reprises his role as Joaquín Torres, Wilson’s protégé, while Carl Lumbly’s Isaiah Bradley – a Black super-soldier subjected to government experimentation – anchors the story’s racial commentary. Yet New World Order transcends its serialised origins.

Shira Haas’ Sabra, an Israeli super-spy, and Giancarlo Esposito’s enigmatic Sidewinder introduce fresh dynamics. Esposito, best known as Breaking Bad’s Gus Fring, reportedly plays a mercenary with ties to Wakanda – a subplot that could tee up Black Panther 3.

A Title’s Political Minefield

Originally dubbed New World Order, the film’s title sparked backlash for its inadvertent echo of antisemitic conspiracy theories. Marvel’s pivot to Brave New World – a nod to Aldous Huxley’s dystopian novel – softens the edge but retains thematic resonance. The story interrogates nationalism, surveillance, and the cost of security, themes Huxley would recognise.

Screenwriters Malcolm Spellman and Dalan Musson (The Falcon and the Winter Soldier) infuse the script with post-COVID scepticism. Scenes of protestors clashing outside the White House feel ripped from headlines, blurring the line between superhero fantasy and reality.

Marvel’s Genre Experiment

Post-Endgame, the MCU has struggled to balance interconnected storytelling with standalone ventures. New World Order leans into risk. Reshoots, prompted by test screenings, reportedly excised three major action sequences in favour of character-driven moments. Onah cites 1970s political thrillers like All the President’s Men as inspiration – a far cry from the CGI spectacles of Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness.

The gamble? To prove that Marvel can thrive without its founding stars. Early tracking suggests a $180 million opening weekend, but the true test lies in longevity. Can a grounded, politically charged narrative resonate in a market dominated by multiverses and cameo-laden fan service?

A Global Box Office Test

With 75% of Marvel’s revenue now coming from international markets, New World Order faces unique pressures. China’s censors, wary of U.S. political themes, may demand cuts to Ford’s presidential scenes. Meanwhile, the film’s exploration of racial justice could galvanise audiences in Europe and Latin America.

Marvel’s decision to release on Valentine’s Day – a slot typically reserved for rom-coms – signals confidence. Yet the date also invites comparisons to Deadpool’s success in blending romance and chaos.

As the credits roll on Captain America: New World Order, one truth emerges: The MCU is no longer a universe – it’s a mosaic. Mackie’s Captain America, flawed and fiercely human, embodies this evolution. Whether audiences embrace him as they did Rogers remains uncertain. But in an industry averse to risk, Marvel’s willingness to dismantle its own icons is itself heroic. The shield hasn’t just changed hands; it’s been reforged for a world where heroes must navigate shades of grey. And in that ambiguity lies Marvel’s next act.