Senior editor and core member of the editorial team, contributing criticism and features across contemporary art, film and literature.

By Sara Bright

Jean Marais was a face. Not just any face, but one of the great, heroic faces of 20th-century French cinema – impossibly handsome, impossibly noble. For generations, he was the swashbuckling hero of films like Le Comte de Monte-Cristo, the elusive phantom of crime in Fantômas, the romantic lead of Cocteau’s cinematic dreams. But behind the iconic visage, behind the actor’s mask, there was another artist at work, one who dealt not in flickering light but in solid, tactile form. Today, Creativitys.UK will tell you about the hidden world of Jean Marais the sculptor, a man whose hands, as skilled as his famous face was expressive, moulded clay and bronze with a talent that even left Picasso astonished. It’s a story that reveals a profound, almost sentient connection between his various creative lives, where the man of action on screen was also a man of quiet, solitary creation.

The story has become a touchstone in the Marais mythology, a vignette that perfectly encapsulates his overlooked talent. Upon seeing some of Marais’s early sculptures, Pablo Picasso, a man not known for distributing praise lightly, was genuinely taken aback. He expressed a sort of bewildered admiration, reportedly wondering aloud how a man with such an innate gift for sculpture, such a natural feel for mass and form, could possibly “waste his time on some film shoots and theatre work.” It’s a powerful validation, coming from the undisputed titan of 20th-century art. Picasso, who had revolutionised sculpture himself, recognised in Marais a kindred spirit, an artist whose hands possessed an intuitive understanding of the medium. He saw not the dilettante dabbling of a famous actor, but the authentic work of a born sculptor. This anecdote isn’t just a celebrity endorsement; it’s a critical piece of evidence that forces us to re-evaluate Marais’s entire creative output, to see his acting and his sculpting not as separate pursuits, but as parallel expressions of a single, restless artistic spirit.

Marais himself, however, always maintained a posture of profound humility, almost a disarming nonchalance, about his multifaceted talents. He famously brushed off serious labels, saying, “I don’t make sculptures because I am a sculptor, I don’t paint because I am a painter, I don’t write because I am a writer. I’m just amusing myself, and you know it… I don’t even know if I am a real actor.” This was not false modesty. It was a genuine reflection of his artistic philosophy. For Marais, creation was not about claiming a title or belonging to a specific discipline. It was about the act itself. It was a vital, necessary process, a way of staying engaged with the world, of warding off the idleness that he seemed to fear. “My good fortune,” he once reflected, “was that I fell in love with the theatre, I painted pictures that required months of attention, not allowing me to remain inactive.” The act of making – whether on a stage, a canvas, or with a lump of clay – was his way of being in the world. He started drawing at ten, designed a clothing collection at fifty, took up ceramics at sixty, and, remarkably, began his serious work in sculpture at seventy-three.

One cannot speak of Jean Marais without speaking of Jean Cocteau. Their relationship – as collaborators, lovers, and lifelong muses to one another – is one of the great symbiotic partnerships in art history. Cocteau, the surrealist poet and filmmaker, saw in Marais not just a handsome actor, but a living embodiment of his artistic ideals. He cast him as the Beast in La Belle et la Bête (1946) and as Orpheus in his seminal film of 1950. Cocteau’s aesthetic, a blend of classical mythology and dreamlike surrealism, seeped into Marais’s very being. It is no surprise, then, that Marais’s own sculptural work is infused with this same spirit. His forms are often mythological, his figures contorted with a lyrical, almost poetic agony or ecstasy. There is a theatricality to his sculptures, a sense of high drama captured in bronze. They are not static figures; they are actors frozen in the most pivotal moment of their story. The influence is unmistakable. In a way, Cocteau sculpted Marais on film, and Marais, in turn, continued to sculpt in the Cocteau-esque language of myth and metamorphosis long after the director was gone.

The man who walked through walls

Perhaps Marais’s most famous and publicly accessible sculpture is his tribute to the writer Marcel Aymé, located on the Place Marcel-Aymé in Montmartre. Aymé, a friend of Marais, was the author of the beloved short story Le Passe-Muraille (The Man Who Walked Through Walls). The story tells of a modest clerk named Dutilleul who discovers he has the ability to pass through solid objects. Marais’s bronze sculpture, unveiled in 1989, brilliantly captures the story’s central character at the very moment of his magical act. Dutilleul is depicted emerging from a stone wall, one hand outstretched, his face a mixture of effort and surprise. It is a work of immense charm and technical skill. The bronze seems to melt into the stone, creating a perfect illusion of impossible passage.

But the sculpture is more than a clever illustration. It is a deeply personal statement. By immortalising Dutilleul, Marais is paying homage not just to his friend Aymé, but to the very idea of artistic transformation. The actor who spent his life slipping into different roles, the man who moved seamlessly between cinema, theatre, and the plastic arts, creates a monument to a character who defies physical boundaries. The sculpture can be read as a metaphor for the artist’s own life – a life spent passing through the walls that separate different creative worlds. It is a work of friendship, a landmark of Montmartre, and a witty, self-referential nod to his own chameleonic existence.

A sculptural self-portrait

Beyond his public monuments, Marais’s more personal works reveal a fascinating inner world. He created a series of self-portraits that are anything but conventional. In one, his own face emerges from a swirling, almost violent vortex of bronze, as if he is wrestling his own identity out of the raw material. In another, he depicts himself as a sort of tormented eagle, a bird of prey with a human face, symbolising perhaps the predatory nature of fame or the soaring ambition of his own spirit. These are not the works of someone “just amusing himself.” They are raw, expressive, and deeply introspective. They show an artist grappling with his own image, with the very face that made him famous. The same face that was a mask for the public was, in his studio, a subject for intense and often brutal self-examination. In these sculptures, the heroic certainty of the screen hero gives way to something more complex and vulnerable. It is here, in the quiet solitude of his workshop, that we get a glimpse of the man behind the icon, using the unyielding medium of bronze to explore the fluid, often contradictory, nature of his own identity.

Jean Marais the sculptor forces us to reconsider the nature of celebrity and creativity. We are so often inclined to put artists in boxes: he is an actor, she is a painter. Marais defied these categories. He approached all his creative endeavours with the same spirit of passionate, almost obsessive, engagement. The energy he brought to a sword fight on screen was the same energy he brought to a battle with a lump of clay. His work in sculpture was not a hobby; it was a necessity, another vital outlet for a creative force too powerful to be contained by a single medium. Picasso saw it immediately. He saw that the hands that could so convincingly wield a prop sword were the same hands that could instinctively shape a form in three dimensions. In the end, Jean Marais was not just an actor who sculpted. He was an artist, pure and simple, and the world was his medium.