Senior editor and core member of the editorial team, contributing criticism and features across contemporary art, film and literature.

By Sara Bright

The history of cinema is punctuated by seismic shifts, moments when a single film, or a visionary director, irrevocably alters the very language and grammar of the art form. There is a profound, almost revolutionary sentience that ignites when established conventions are not merely challenged, but audaciously dismantled, paving the way for new modes of expression. Jean-Luc Godard’s 1960 masterpiece, À bout de souffle (Breathless), stands as one such monumental event, a film that didn’t just break the rules, but gleefully “exploded” them, heralding the dawn of the French New Wave (La Nouvelle Vague) and leaving an indelible mark on generations of filmmakers to come. Creativitys.UK will tell you about the enduring impact of this cinematic atom bomb, exploring its radical techniques, its cultural context, and how, 65 years on, its defiant spirit continues to resonate, making it a cornerstone of film history analysis.

A Deliberate Act of Detonation

Jean-Luc Godard was unambiguous about his intentions with Breathless. Speaking to the BBC’s Olivier Todd in 1964, he declared his aim to “take everything the cinema had done – girls, gangsters, cars – explode all this and put an end once and for all to the old style.” This was not mere hyperbole. When Breathless premiered in France on 16 March 1960, its stylish, semi-improvised narrative, fragmented editing, offbeat dialogue, and nonchalant approach to storytelling felt utterly revolutionary. As the renowned US film critic Roger Ebert astutely observed, “No debut film since Citizen Kane in 1942 has been as influential.” The film’s surface plot – the doomed romance between amoral petty criminal Michel Poiccard (a charismatic Jean-Paul Belmondo) and enigmatic American journalism student Patricia Franchini (Jean Seberg) as Michel evades arrest after murdering a policeman – served as a loose framework for Godard’s primary concern: shattering cinematic conventions and forging a new, more immediate relationship with the audience. This marked a pivotal moment in Jean-Luc Godard’s filmography.

The Cahiers du Cinéma Crucible

Godard’s radical vision was incubated in the fervent intellectual environment of 1950s Paris, specifically within the influential film magazine Cahiers du Cinéma. Born in 1930 to affluent Franco-Swiss parents, Godard, alongside fellow cinephiles like François Truffaut, Éric Rohmer, and Claude Chabrol (who would also become key figures in the New Wave), railed against the prevailing French cinema of the time – polished, studio-produced literary adaptations that they felt lacked genuine emotion and failed to capture the realities of human behaviour. Simultaneously, a deluge of American films, banned during the Nazi occupation, flooded French cinemas following the Blum-Byrnes agreements. These young critics, particularly Godard, were captivated by American genre films, especially westerns and detective thrillers (the latter inspiring Nino Frank to coin the term film noir). They revered directors like Orson Welles, Alfred Hitchcock, and Howard Hawks, whom they championed as “auteurs” – true authors of their films, whose unique creative visions transcended studio constraints. This auteur theory influence was foundational to the New Wave’s philosophy.

Rules Made to Be Broken

With Breathless, Godard seized the opportunity to translate these critical theories into practice. He explained his methodology to the BBC: “Conventions were exploded to make something with the remains… And when there is nothing useful left, we can start from scratch on fresh ground.” Truffaut provided the initial story, loosely based on a 1952 news article, but Godard largely abandoned the script during filming. Instead, he encouraged improvisation, often feeding lines to Belmondo and Seberg from behind the camera. This spontaneity, coupled with the necessity of shooting sequentially due to the ad-libbed dialogue, imbued the film with a raw, personal feel. The Breathless film techniques were born of both artistic intent and budgetary necessity. To make the cheapest film possible, Godard and his cinematographer, Raoul Coutard (a former war photographer), took to the streets of Paris, utilising a lightweight handheld camera and natural light. This guerrilla-style approach, often executed without permits, meant that ordinary Parisians frequently became unwitting extras, lending an unparalleled authenticity to the film’s depiction of city life. The camera itself, noisy and unable to record synchronised sound, necessitated post-production dubbing, which often resulted in dialogue not perfectly matching the actors’ lip movements – a stylistic quirk that continues to fuel debate. One of the film’s most iconic sequences, with Michel and Patricia strolling down the Champs-Élysées, was achieved by Godard pulling Coutard in a wheelchair. Italian director Bernardo Bertolucci, deeply influenced by the film, recalled to the BBC, “The freedom of shooting on the Champs-Élysées… It was like the invention of a mythology for me.”

Brechtian Alienation and Jump Cuts

Godard, however, was not interested in creating an illusion of unmediated reality. Influenced by the German playwright Bertolt Brecht, who sought to keep audiences critically engaged by reminding them they were watching a construct, Godard employed various Brechtian techniques in cinema. Characters frequently break the fourth wall, addressing the audience directly and commenting on their own situations, disrupting the viewer’s passive immersion. The film’s score, too, is deliberately jarring, starting and stopping abruptly, often disconnected from the on-screen action. But it was Breathless‘s revolutionary use of jump cuts – abrupt transitions forward in time within the same scene – that became its most defining and influential stylistic signature. Initially a pragmatic solution to shorten an overly long film, Godard chose to condense takes by excising sections without attempting to smooth the edits. This technique shattered conventional notions of continuity editing, imbuing the film with an energetic, skittish rhythm and forcing the audience to remain constantly aware of the filmmaking process. As Bertolucci noted, “At school they were always telling you how to avoid jump cuts which were considered mistakes, and the movie was full of jump cuts.”

Subverting Conventions, Inviting Interpretation

Godard further emphasised the film’s constructed nature through self-referentiality and homages to his cinematic influences, while simultaneously subverting the very genres he admired. Otto Preminger’s Whirlpool plays in a cinema Patricia enters; a shot mimicking a gun barrel view from the western Forty Guns appears. The revered French gangster film director Jean-Pierre Melville cameos as a celebrity author, and Godard himself appears as a bystander. Michel, the protagonist, consciously emulates Humphrey Bogart but lacks the heroic qualities of his idol. Patricia, potentially a classic femme fatale, betrays Michel, yet their relationship feels detached, her motives opaque. Breathless deliberately eschews easy answers, leaving interpretation and judgment to the viewer. This New Wave cinema characteristics approach, emphasising ambiguity and intellectual engagement, was a radical departure.

The impact of Breathless was immediate and profound. Its distinctive storytelling, imaginative camerawork, and effortlessly cool young leads resonated with audiences eager for something new. It won Godard the Silver Bear for Best Director at the 1960 Berlin International Film Festival and, more significantly, galvanised a generation of aspiring filmmakers. Mike Hodges, director of Get Carter, described its effect as “like just being free, it was like being on a drug.” He likened Godard’s impact to the Impressionists revolutionising painting. The film’s influence permeated Hollywood, with its moral ambiguity and tonal shifts visible in films like Bonnie and Clyde (1967), its innovative camera angles in The Graduate (1967), and its low-budget, improvisational techniques in Easy Rider (1969). Directors of the “New Hollywood” era, such as Martin Scorsese and Francis Ford Coppola, openly acknowledged their debt to the French New Wave. Quentin Tarantino, who named his production company A Band Apart after a Godard film, famously stated that “Godard did to movies what Bob Dylan did to music: they both revolutionised their forms.”

Jean-Luc Godard’s Breathless remains a towering landmark in cinematic history, a testament to the power of audacious innovation and a defiant rejection of complacency. Its enduring legacy lies not just in its stylistic breakthroughs but in its empowering message to future filmmakers: that cinema is a language to be constantly reinvented, a medium where rules are made to be broken, and where the most profound statements can emerge from the most unconventional approaches. It persuaded generations that, as Edgar Wright noted, it is possible to “just pick up a camera and start shooting,” democratising the art form and forever changing the landscape of global cinema.