By Tessa Nolan
There is a particular quality of light in Moscow at the end of August. It’s a low, golden light that seems to catch on every surface, imbuing the city’s formidable architecture with a strange, almost theatrical softness. It was against this backdrop, on the ancient Kitai-Gorod wall and the dramatic sweep of the Floating Bridge in Zaryadye Park, that Moscow Fashion Week unfolded. And as collections were presented with the Kremlin’s domes looming in the background, it became clear that this was more than a series of shows. It was a statement.
For several days, a singular message emerged from the runways of the Russian capital: a full-throated, unapologetic rejection of minimalism. This was not the quiet, intellectual restraint that has dominated so many European collections for the past decade. This was a spectacle. It was a city dressing for the part it wishes to play, using the language of fashion to articulate a kind of aesthetic sovereignty. The prevailing mood was an embrace of everything at once – a glorious, defiant maximalism that felt both deeply Russian and strangely universal.
The event, which brought together designers from across Russia, as well as China, India, Brazil, and South Africa, felt less like a trade show and more like a cultural summit. What they collectively proposed for the coming season was not a quiet evolution, but a rich and complex form of adornment. This was fashion as cultural armour.
A Return to Opulence
The most immediate and striking takeaway was the sheer textural richness on display. This was a fashion you were meant to feel. Designers turned to materials that speak of luxury and a certain kind of untamed fantasy, materials that have, in other fashion capitals, become politically fraught.
Feathers, for instance, were everywhere. They appeared not as a timid detail, but as a core component of the garment. At Alexandra Serova and Leffers, they formed soft, dramatic trims on coats and jackets, while Gapanovich used them to add a wild, almost feral energy to structured pieces. Perhaps the most literal interpretation came from Alena Akhmadullina, who sent models down the runway that looked for all the world like Firebirds from a Russian fairytale, their forms shrouded in delicate, fiery plumage. It was a move that felt deeply rooted in national folklore, a translation of myth into wearable art.
Alongside feathers came fur. In a world where many major houses have publicly renounced it, Moscow designers embraced it with a confident flourish. We saw it in bold, unapologetic colours – pinks, reds, and greens – and in shaggy, untamed textures that prioritised visual impact over subtlety. Brands like Muliér and Vira Plotnikova showed elegant muffs and stoles, a nod to a classic, almost aristocratic vision of Russian winter. But others used it as trim on collars and skirts, a detail that could evoke anything from a powerful woman of the Soviet-era nomenklatura to a pre-revolutionary Boyar princess. The point, it seemed, was not just warmth, but visual weight and historical resonance.
And then there was the shine. The sheer volume of sequins and metallic fabrics was almost blinding. This was not the delicate shimmer of eveningwear; this was a full-on embrace of disco-era hedonism and futuristic gleam. Julia Dalakian and Ianis Chamalidy used paillettes to create liquid surfaces that moved with the body, while Indian duo Shantnu & Nikhil incorporated them into their grand, almost ceremonial pieces.
What was interesting was how this single element – the sequin – could be used to communicate entirely different moods. In some collections, it felt romantic and playful. In others, particularly when rendered in silver or gunmetal, it took on a brutalist, almost industrial quality. It seems the collective unconscious has decided that this world, in its current state, is desperately lacking in radiance. The mandate from Moscow is clear: it is not only acceptable to shine, it is necessary.
The Body Remapped
Beneath the layers of fur and sequins, a conversation was taking place about the very shape of the body. For years, fashion has been dominated by the oversized silhouette, a comfortable but ultimately anonymous mode of dressing. This season in Moscow felt like a direct response to that. The waist, after a long period in hiding, has officially returned.
The corset was the most obvious tool for this re-emergence. At SOL, Gapanovich, and Anna Khropotova, corsets were used not as underpinnings, but as powerful outer garments, cinching waists over shirts and dresses. This wasn’t a historical recreation; it was a modern deployment of a classic form, a way to reclaim structure and definition. In a sense, the corset’s return is the perfect antidote to the slouch. It demands posture. It demands presence. It is a garment that announces itself, and its wearer, with an unambiguous confidence.
Yet, in a fascinating counterpoint to this rigid structure, another major trend emerged: the soft, relaxed wrap closure. We saw it in coats, blouses, and dresses from designers like Masha Andrianova and UNKE. This silhouette is the antithesis of the corset’s discipline. It suggests the languid elegance of a silk dressing gown, the comfortable embrace of a beloved robe.
To see these two opposing ideas – the hard line of the corset and the soft drape of the wrap – flourish side-by-side is revealing. It speaks to a multifaceted understanding of femininity, one that accommodates both strength and softness, structure and ease. It suggests a woman who is in complete control of how her form is presented to the world, choosing her silhouette as she chooses her mood.
The Delicate Defence
Even the most delicate of fabrics were imbued with a sense of strength. Lace and guipure, so often associated with lingerie or bridal wear, were shown as versatile, even powerful, materials. At Sarine Saakyan, an Armenian designer, intricate lace was used for entire beach ensembles, while the Russian brand 404 Not Found showed how a delicate lace dress could be given a tough, urban edge when paired with a heavy leather jacket.
This is the essence of the new Moscow sensibility. It takes something traditionally seen as fragile and proves its resilience. The message is that delicacy is not the same as weakness. Like the intricate, beautiful, yet surprisingly strong structure of a spider’s web, the lace on display felt both beautiful and faintly dangerous. It was a form of delicate armour.
What are we to make of this collective turn towards the spectacular? It feels like more than a simple shift in aesthetic preference. It is a conscious choice to create and celebrate a visual language that is dense, layered, and unapologetically beautiful. Perhaps the most fitting comparison is not to another fashion week, but to the art of the Fabergé egg. Both are expressions of a culture that values craftsmanship, that delights in intricate detail, and that is not afraid of opulence. Both are, in their own way, declarations of a unique cultural identity.
As I left the final show, the Moscow sky was turning a deep, bruised purple. The city’s lights began to glitter, and for a moment, they seemed to be in conversation with the sequins and metallic fabrics I had just seen on the runway. The message was clear. In a world that often prizes quiet conformity, Moscow has chosen to be loud, to be brilliant, and to be absolutely, breathtakingly itself.





