Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy Closes the Diary — and Proves the Rom-Com Still Has a Pulse

Senior editor and core member of the editorial team, contributing criticism and features across contemporary art, film and literature.

By Sara Bright

Twenty-four years after Helen Fielding first adapted her Independent column into a film that redefined the British romantic comedy, the Bridget Jones saga has reached its conclusion. Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy, released on 13 February 2025, arrived not merely as a sequel but as a reckoning – with grief, with ageing, with the rom-com’s own precarious place in a streaming-dominated market. Directed by Michael Morris, adapted from Fielding’s 2013 novel, and anchored by Renée Zellweger’s most emotionally layered performance, the film has been both a critical and commercial triumph.

The £12.3-Million Valentine’s Gambit: How Bridget Jones Conquered UK Cinemas

Opening in UK cinemas on 13 February 2025 – one day after its French theatrical debut via StudioCanal – Mad About the Boy grossed £12.3 million in its first four-day weekend across the UK and Ireland, setting the highest-ever opening for a romantic comedy in that market, according to Universal Pictures. It held the number-one UK box-office position for three consecutive weeks, ultimately amassing £46.4 million domestically (per 25thframe.co.uk). Globally, the film earned $140.4 million against a $50 million production budget (The Numbers), pushing the four-film franchise past a cumulative $850 million worldwide – surpassing the entire 13-film Halloween slasher series on the all-time franchise chart (Screen Rant).

The UK success was especially striking given the film’s absence from American cinemas. In a decision that drew widespread criticism from US film critics, Universal opted to release Mad About the Boy exclusively on its Peacock streaming platform in the United States on 13 February, forgoing a theatrical run entirely. Collider called the strategy “a huge mistake,” estimating the film could have added at least $14 million in domestic box-office revenue had it received even a limited US theatrical window. In the UK, pre-sale tickets reportedly outpaced those for Barbie in 2023, according to Screen Daily – evidence that the rom-com audience, often dismissed by studios as a niche market, remains formidable when a beloved property is given the right platform.

From Diary Entries to Widowhood: Fielding’s Boldest Narrative Bet

The film’s premise – drawn from Fielding’s third novel, published in 2013 – represents the most radical departure in the franchise’s history. Mark Darcy, Bridget’s on-again-off-again love interest across three films and the man she finally married in Bridget Jones’s Baby (2016), is dead. Killed by an unexploded mine while on a humanitarian mission in Sudan, his death occurs off-screen, its circumstances revealed gradually through the film’s first act. Bridget, now the mother of preteen children Billy and Mabel, is a woman in stasis – attending a “celebration of life” for her husband while her friends pressure her to re-enter the dating world, oscillating between school runs and late-night wine sessions in her Hampstead home.

This tonal shift – from slapstick romantic chaos to the interior landscape of grief – rests almost entirely on Zellweger’s shoulders. The actress, who won her second Academy Award for Judy (2019) and returned to Bridget after a nine-year absence, plays the character with a restraint that previous sequels never demanded. A sequence in which Bridget wanders their family home, hearing phantom echoes of Darcy’s voice, communicates loss without melodrama. The performance earned her a nomination for Best Actress in a Limited Series or Movie at the 31st Critics’ Choice Awards, where the film itself won Best Movie Made for Television.

“Renée Zellweger gives her best and most vulnerable performance of Bridget Jones in a fourth installment that pieces the titular character’s life back together in the wake of insurmountable loss,” wrote Maxance Vincent at FilmSpeak, awarding the film a rare A grade.

The Ejiofor Equation: When Mr Wallaker Out-Darcs Mark Darcy

The romantic architecture of Mad About the Boy replaces the familiar Darcy-Cleaver binary with a generational divide. Roxster, played by Leo Woodall (One Day, The White Lotus), is a 29-year-old park ranger and biochemistry student who pursues Bridget on Tinder – a May-December romance that the film treats with surprising sincerity rather than cradle-snatching gags. Opposing him is Mr Wallaker (Chiwetel Ejiofor), Bridget’s son’s science teacher, a widower whose emotional reticence and quiet decency channel the original Darcy archetype more directly than Firth’s character ever did in later films.

Ejiofor’s casting proved a revelation. His chemistry with Zellweger – simmering during parent-teacher conferences and a school bonfire outing – anchors the film’s romantic second act. The Independent called him “really more Mr Darcy than Mark Darcy ever was – stubborn and uptight, yet still irresistibly dashing.” Woodall, by contrast, drew sharper division: the Guardian observed that the actor “has none of the charm and believable humanity he has showed us before,” though the Independent praised the age-gap romance for putting “aside ‘cougar’ sensationalism to engage sincerely with the idea of navigating love while at different stages in life.”

Hugh Grant, returning as Daniel Cleaver, occupies the film’s most intriguing role: the reformed cad functioning as Bridget’s unofficial babysitter and confidant. Grant, who reportedly contributed to his own dialogue, delivers metacommentary on the franchise’s evolution, quipping about Cleaver’s irrelevance in a post-#MeToo landscape. Emma Thompson, back as Bridget’s withering gynaecologist Dr Rawlings, provides the film’s sharpest comic moments. The screenplay, co-written by Fielding with Dan Mazer and Abi Morgan (The Iron Lady, Eric), manages the tonal balancing act with deftness – threading the needle between signature slapstick and weightier emotional material without collapsing into sentimentality or farce. For a broader view of how contemporary British Film is engaging with complex female protagonists, the trajectory is instructive.

Michael Morris and the Television Director’s Cinematic Intuition

The choice of Michael Morris as director was, in retrospect, inspired. The English filmmaker spent two decades as one of television’s most reliable dramatic stylists – directing episodes of Better Call Saul, House of Cards, and Halt and Catch Fire. His feature debut, To Leslie (2022), earned Andrea Riseborough a controversial Oscar nomination for Best Actress.

Morris’s sensibility proved ideally suited to Mad About the Boy‘s tonal register. Where the original trilogy’s directors – Sharon Maguire, Beeban Kidron – favoured broad comedic staging, Morris opts for intimate close-ups and patient dramatic pacing. The film’s twenty-minute opening sequence, establishing Bridget’s grief through accumulated domestic details rather than exposition, reflects a television director’s instinct for sustained character work. “It’s less comedic than the others, though it’s not without its fair share of fun,” noted FilmSpeak, “the film is elevated by a career-best turn from Zellweger.”

Cinematographer Suzie Lavelle, whose credits include Normal People and The Quiet Girl, brings naturalistic warmth to the film’s London settings – Hampstead Heath, prep schools, the domestic interiors of a well-updated Bridget – grounding heightened comic premises in recognisable geography. Dustin O’Halloran’s score, which won Best Original Score at the Hollywood Music in Media Awards, provides understated emotional texture avoiding the sentimentality trap.

The Peacock Problem: Why Universal Left £14 Million on the American Table

The film’s peculiar release structure – theatrical worldwide, Peacock-only in the US – crystallised a debate about legacy franchises and the economics of streaming. Universal’s decision appeared to treat Mad About the Boy as a subscriber-acquisition vehicle rather than a theatrical product, a calculation the film’s UK performance seemed to undermine. UK pre-sale tickets reportedly outpaced those for Barbie (per Screen Daily), and the record-breaking opening demonstrated that audience appetite for big-screen romantic comedy remains robust.

The economics were more nuanced. Bridget Jones’s Baby (2016) had earned just $24.2 million domestically against a $35 million budget, while grossing $187 million internationally – overseas revenues accounting for 89% of total ticket sales. With a $50 million production budget and an estimated $40-50 million global marketing spend required for a theatrical launch, Universal calculated the US market could not justify the expenditure. As Collider observed, “there’s a reason you could’ve missed the fourth installment” in the US, where the franchise’s final chapter arrived as a solitary streaming event on Valentine’s Day weekend. The streaming-versus-theatrical question, as this publication has explored in its coverage of Literature adaptations, remains one of the defining tensions of contemporary British culture.

Eighty-Nine Percent: How the Fourth Film Became the Franchise’s Critical Peak

The critical reception represented a striking reversal of the franchise’s historical trajectory. The original Bridget Jones’s Diary (2001) holds 79% on Rotten Tomatoes; The Edge of Reason (2004) dropped to 54%; Bridget Jones’s Baby recovered to 78%. Mad About the Boy achieved 89% across 115 critics’ reviews, with an average rating of 7.1/10. Metacritic assigned it 72 out of 100.

The consensus, per Rotten Tomatoes: “A bittersweet romp about new beginnings with another sparkling turn by Renée Zellweger, Mad About the Boy gracefully closes the book on Bridget Jones’ diary.” Not all critics were equally effusive. The Guardian‘s Peter Bradshaw found the film “strangely dazed,” writing that “the Bridget Jones series has frankly run out of steam.” Variety characterised it as “a romantic but mild finale.” But the Independent declared it “the best Bridget Jones sequel yet,” and NPR praised Zellweger for remaining “refreshingly herself” across a quarter-century of embodying the character. The film won Best Movie Made for Television at the 31st Critics’ Choice Awards and was nominated for Outstanding Television Movie at the 77th Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards.

Growing Older Without Growing Tame: The Diary Closes

What Mad About the Boy ultimately achieves is a tonal recalibration of what the rom-com can accommodate. The franchise began in 2001 as a comedy of self-deprecation – cigarettes, weight anxieties, the pursuit of the “perfect” man. By its fourth chapter, it has absorbed widowhood, single parenthood, midlife reinvention, and the generational friction of a woman navigating Tinder while raising children who were not yet born when the first film premiered.

The finale, set at a chaotic Valentine’s Day school play, resists tidy romantic resolution. Instead, Bridget chooses self-sufficiency – a choice the film frames not as defeat but as the culmination of twenty-four years of character growth. “Thank you for loving this mess,” Zellweger’s Bridget says, breaking the fourth wall in a closing monologue that acknowledges both the character’s journey and the audience’s loyalty.

As the credits roll to It’s Raining Men – a callback to Bridget’s iconic karaoke debut in the original film – the message is clear: growing older needn’t mean growing tame. For a franchise built on pratfalls and prosecco, that is a legacy worth raising a glass to. Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy is available on Peacock in the United States and on home video internationally.