Al Pacino Died and Came Back With Bad News: 'There's Nothing There

Senior editor and core member of the editorial team, contributing criticism and features across contemporary art, film and literature.

By Sara Bright

In 2020, Al Pacino died. Not theatrically, not in character, not for the cameras – he actually died, clinically and completely, on the floor of his own living room. His pulse stopped. Six paramedics flooded the room. Two doctors stood over him in what he later described as “outer space outfits.” For a span of time that no one measured precisely, the man who played Michael Corleone, Tony Montana, and Frank Slade was, by every medical definition, gone.

He came back. And when he did, he brought no white light, no tunnel, no celestial choir. “I didn’t see the white light or anything,” Pacino told The New York Times in October 2024, during a conversation timed to the publication of his memoir Sonny Boy. “There’s nothing there.”

It is, perhaps, the most Al Pacino thing imaginable – to die and return with a Shakespeare quote rather than a spiritual revelation. “As Hamlet says, ‘To be, or not to be,'” he continued. “And then he says, ‘No more.’ Well, it’s not.” He paused. “You’re gone.”

The Anatomy of an Exit

The details of Pacino’s near-death experience are clinical and terrifying in equal measure. In the early months of the pandemic, before vaccines existed, the actor contracted COVID-19. What began as a vague sense of feeling “unusually not good” rapidly escalated. He developed a fever. He became severely dehydrated. He was waiting for a nurse to arrive when his body simply shut down.

His assistant, Michael Quinn, acted immediately. “He got the people coming because the nurse that was taking care of me said, ‘I don’t feel a pulse on this guy,'” Pacino recounted in an interview with People Magazine. The paramedics arrived to find an 80-year-old man without a pulse – a cardiac event that, in most cases, proves fatal.

What followed was a scene that Pacino describes with the detached wonder of a man watching his own life from the outside. He opened his eyes to find six paramedics surrounding him, an ambulance stationed outside his door, and two doctors clad in protective gear. “Everybody was around me, and they said: ‘He’s back. He’s here,'” he recalled.

The experience lasted seconds – or minutes – or longer. No one knows. What Pacino knows is that during the interval when his heart was silent, he experienced nothing. No metaphysical ripples. No astral projection. No encounter with deceased loved ones. Just absence. “It was no more,” he said. “You’re gone.”

Shakespeare Knew All Along

Pacino’s choice to frame his death through Hamlet is not incidental. It is, in fact, the most revealing detail of the entire account. Here is a man who has spent his life inhabiting other people’s words, and when confronted with the most personal and profound experience a human being can undergo, he reaches instinctively for the Bard.

The “undiscovered country from whose bourn no traveller returns” is not merely a literary allusion for Pacino – it is a lived report. He went to that country. He returned. And his testimony confirms what Hamlet suspected four centuries ago: that the great beyond may simply be the great nothing.

This is, depending on your perspective, either bleak or liberating. Pacino seems to regard it as neither. “I don’t find this morbid, man,” he said. There is no anguish in his voice, no crisis of faith, no desperate groping for consolation. There is, instead, the calm pragmatism of a man who has spent fifty years playing characters who stare into the abyss and have always suspected that the abyss stares back with blank indifference.

The existential weight of this admission should not be underestimated. In a culture saturated with near-death narratives – the tunnel, the light, the warm embrace of departed relatives – Pacino’s account is a stark counterpoint. He did not experience transcendence. He experienced termination. And he returned not with answers but with a question that he admits he had never truly considered before: “What is it when there’s no more?”

Sonny Boy: The Memoir as Autopsy

Pacino’s reflections on death arrive within the pages of Sonny Boy, his memoir published in October 2024 by Penguin Press. Written with Dave Itzkoff, the book is an instant New York Times bestseller and one of People Magazine‘s top ten books of the year – a distinction that speaks to its appeal beyond the usual celebrity-memoir market.

Sonny Boy is, by all accounts, an unusual artefact. The Washington Examiner called it “so touchingly reflective that it left me in tears.” The Wall Street Journal praised its preservation of Pacino’s personality, “with all his intelligence, his wit and his eagerness to talk about the theatre history he loves.” The Library Journal described it as “a must, not just for movie fans.”

What distinguishes the memoir from its peers is Pacino’s refusal to mythologise himself. The book opens with his postwar childhood in the South Bronx – leaping over tenement rooftops, smoking cigarettes in alleys, running with a troop of friends whose lives would be destroyed by crime and drugs while Al, thanks to his mother and grandmother, was spared. It traces his apprenticeship in avant-garde theatre, his years of bohemian poverty, his battles with alcohol, and his eventual detonation onto the world stage with The Godfather in 1972.

But the book’s beating centre is what Penguin Random House describes as “the spirit of love and purpose” – Pacino’s recognition that he was “lucky enough to fall deeply in love with a craft before he had the foggiest idea of any of its earthly rewards, and he never fell out of love.” Against this warmth, the near-death episode reads as a kind of interlude – a brief, cold parenthesis within a life defined by passionate engagement.

Lear Rex: Facing the Wasteland

There is a particular irony in the fact that, having confronted his own mortality, Pacino chose to play King Lear. Shakespeare’s mad king – stripped of power, abandoned by his daughters, driven to the edge of sanity on a storm-blasted heath – is perhaps the most devastating portrait of ageing and extinction in the Western canon. That Pacino would seek out such a role at eighty-five, after literally losing his pulse, suggests not escapism but a deliberate reckoning.

Lear Rex, directed by Bernard Rose, is an adaptation that has been gestating since at least 2023. The cast is formidable: Jessica Chastain as Goneril, Ariana DeBose as Cordelia, Rachel Brosnahan as Regan, Peter Dinklage as the Fool, and LaKeith Stanfield as Edmund. Principal photography wrapped in Los Angeles in October 2024, and the film is expected to reach screens in late 2025 or 2026.

Producer Barry Navidi, who has collaborated with Pacino on five previous projects including The Merchant of Venice and Modi, has described the project as a natural extension of the actor’s lifelong engagement with Shakespeare. Pacino has long been drawn to the Bard – his 2004 portrayal of Shylock in The Merchant of Venice demonstrated both his capacity for stage-born intensity and his willingness to interrogate the moral architecture of canonical roles.

With Lear Rex, the parallels between actor and character become almost uncanny. Lear’s journey is one of confrontation – with betrayal, with the elements, with the void of his own authority. Pacino, who has faced his own void and returned to describe it, brings to the role a gravity that no amount of technical preparation could manufacture. When he speaks of “the undiscovered country,” he does so as a man who has been there.

The Paradox of the Unchanged Man

Perhaps the most striking aspect of Pacino’s near-death experience is its apparent lack of consequence. When asked whether the episode had altered his approach to life, he answered without hesitation: “Not at all.”

This is a remarkable admission. Most near-death narratives hinge on transformation – the protagonist emerges renewed, reprioritised, reborn. Pacino emerges the same. The experience was, in his telling, philosophically significant but practically inert. He did not stop working. He did not restructure his days. He did not find God or abandon the search. He simply continued, armed with a new understanding that the lights go out and nothing follows.

There is, in this refusal to be transformed, something almost heroic. It suggests a man so thoroughly integrated into his own existence – so complete in his commitment to the life he has built – that even death cannot reorient him. Pacino’s answer is not nihilism; it is the serene indifference of a craftsman who knows that the only meaningful response to the knowledge of death is to keep working.

At eighty-five, with Lear Rex on the horizon and a memoir that has connected with readers worldwide, Pacino embodies a paradox that Shakespeare himself would have recognised: that the clearest-eyed view of mortality is not the one that leads to despair, but the one that leads back to the stage. “The rest is silence,” Hamlet says at the end. But for Al Pacino, the rest is never quite silence. There is always another role, another interpretation, another evening in the theatre where the lights come up and the audience leans forward.

He died once. He came back. He had nothing to report. And somehow, that nothing has become the most eloquent statement he has ever made.