Bridgerton: An Exploration of Modern Sensibilities in Regency Romance

By Maria Bregman

The series “Bridgerton” has captivated audiences worldwide with its lavish depiction of early 19th-century English society, replete with sumptuous costumes, intricate social dynamics, and an array of captivating characters. Based on the novels by American author Julia Quinn, “Bridgerton” is a modern reimagining of Regency romance, infused with contemporary themes and sensibilities. This article delves into the phenomenon of “Bridgerton,” examining its literary roots, its approach to historical accuracy, and its impact on modern audiences.

Julia Quinn’s Bridgerton series, consisting of eight books, follows the romantic entanglements of the Bridgerton family against the backdrop of Regency-era England. Quinn, born in 1970, is part of a lineage of authors who have revitalised the Regency romance genre, a tradition popularised by Judith McNaught in 1986 with her novel “Whitney, My Love.” McNaught’s work set the stage for a wave of sentimental fiction that blends historical settings with modern romantic ideals. Over the past few decades, this genre has grown, with more than fifty authors contributing to its evolution, including the likes of Susanna Clarke, whose novel “Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell” also explores Regency England through a fantastical lens.

“Bridgerton,” while rooted in historical settings, consciously employs a postmodern approach to storytelling. This is evident in its diverse casting choices and its modern feminist perspective, which foregrounds women’s agency and decision-making in a manner that departs from historical realities. The inclusion of actors of colour in aristocratic roles, such as the regal Queen Charlotte played by Golda Rosheuvel, is a deliberate anachronism that serves to challenge and expand traditional narratives of British history. This casting decision echoes the approach seen in the musical “Hamilton,” where historical figures are portrayed by actors of diverse ethnic backgrounds, highlighting the universality of their struggles and achievements.

The reception of “Bridgerton” has been marked by discussions around its historical accuracy. Critics argue that the series’ portrayal of racial diversity in Regency England is not reflective of the period’s realities. However, these criticisms often miss the series’ intentional blending of historical and contemporary elements to create a fictional world that resonates with modern audiences. The emphasis on social rather than racial inequalities aligns with the series’ broader themes of personal freedom and societal constraints.

In “Bridgerton,” the primary focus is on the constraints of social class and gender roles. The series highlights the struggles of its female characters to navigate a society that restricts their autonomy and value based on marital status and social connections. Characters like Daphne Bridgerton and Penelope Featherington are emblematic of the feminist undercurrents that permeate the narrative, portraying women who seek to define their destinies in a patriarchal world. This feminist perspective is a significant departure from traditional Regency romances, which often reinforce the era’s gender norms.

The series’ aesthetic choices further underscore its modern sensibility. The use of contemporary music, reimagined as classical pieces, bridges the gap between past and present, making the historical setting more accessible to today’s viewers. This anachronistic use of music, along with the vibrant colour palettes and stylised costumes, creates a visual and auditory experience that feels both timeless and fresh.

“Bridgerton” also engages in a form of cultural critique, using its historical setting to comment on contemporary issues. The series’ portrayal of marriage as a social contract and its exploration of the pressures faced by women to conform to societal expectations resonate with ongoing debates about gender equality and personal autonomy. By juxtaposing Regency-era norms with modern values, “Bridgerton” invites viewers to reflect on how far society has come and how far it still has to go in terms of gender and racial equality.

The narrative structure of “Bridgerton,” with its emphasis on romantic entanglements and social intrigue, draws heavily from classic literature, particularly the works of Jane Austen. However, it also infuses these elements with a postmodern sensibility, recognising the artificiality of its constructed world while simultaneously inviting viewers to immerse themselves in its drama. This self-awareness is a hallmark of postmodern storytelling, where the boundaries between fiction and reality are often blurred, encouraging audiences to engage critically with the narrative.

The success of “Bridgerton” also speaks to the enduring appeal of romantic escapism. In a world increasingly defined by uncertainty and upheaval, the series offers a form of solace, allowing viewers to lose themselves in a world of balls, duels, and whispered secrets. Yet, this escapism is not without substance; the series’ engagement with themes of identity, agency, and societal expectations provides a meaningful backdrop to its romantic plotlines.

Moreover, the series has sparked renewed interest in the Regency era, prompting viewers to explore the historical context behind the fiction. This engagement with history, albeit through a modern lens, enriches the cultural conversation around the period, highlighting the complexities and contradictions of the era. By presenting a diverse and dynamic portrayal of Regency society, “Bridgerton” challenges monolithic narratives and encourages a more nuanced understanding of history.

In examining the broader cultural impact of “Bridgerton,” it is essential to consider its role in the evolving landscape of television and media. The series exemplifies the shift towards more inclusive and representative storytelling, reflecting broader societal changes in attitudes towards race, gender, and class. This inclusivity not only broadens the appeal of the series but also sets a precedent for future productions, pushing the boundaries of traditional genre conventions.

“Bridgerton” also highlights the interplay between literature and screen adaptations, demonstrating how novels can be reinterpreted to reflect contemporary values and aesthetics. This dynamic relationship between text and screen is indicative of the fluid nature of storytelling, where narratives can be continually reshaped and reimagined to speak to new audiences and contexts.

“Bridgerton” is more than just a period drama; it is a cultural artefact that encapsulates the complexities of adapting historical narratives for modern audiences. Through its innovative casting, feminist perspective, and postmodern storytelling, the series offers a fresh take on Regency romance, challenging traditional notions of historical accuracy while celebrating the timeless appeal of romantic escapism. By bridging the past and present, “Bridgerton” invites viewers to engage with history in a way that is both entertaining and thought-provoking, ensuring its place as a significant cultural phenomenon in the contemporary media landscape.